Tobaccos Cornell & Diehl - Tuggle Hall

	Reviewed By	Date	Rating	Strength	Flavoring	Taste	Room Note
	haredawg (47)	2013-05-02		Medium	None Detected	Medium to Full	Pleasant

I picked up four ounces on spec from reading the reviews here. Ok, so I picked up four ounces on spec from reading the reviews I liked. Pouch aroma was as classic an English aroma as it gets, leathery Latakia, peppery light notes of perique. I realize it's missing a few traditional components; still, the pouch aroma is exactly what I smell for in a classic English blend. I did something I rarely do and loaded a pipe straight from a new pouch, typically I either age the pouch for a while or at least leave a pipe load out to dry for fifteen minutes to an hour. There are a few reasons I didn't this time. 1) I'm putting a new pipe through its paces, a Radice aerobillard, treating it badly and 2) I wrote a premature review of this, a political statement of sorts, that, rightfully so, was removed. So I feel obligated to properly review this for y'all and for Luca of neat pipes and Luigi of Radice. Briefly, as this is a tobacco review, the pipe reveals every nuance of every tobacco I've smoked through it. It's hard to believe there aren't aged and naturally sweet Virginians or spicy Orientals in this blend. Mid bowl there is sweetness, a mellowing of the thick leathery latakia and the hint of perique becomes more a preponderance of evidence. I'm not a stranger to English blends, my palate is moody, salivating sometimes for va/pers, sometimes straight Virginian, sometimes English/Balkan blends. Tuggle Hall smokes like as pure and elegant and stoic an English blend as I've ever smoked, and I've smoked the old 965, Old Ironsides, Penzance, etc. Which was a bit of the stump I was politicking from; I'll be brief. The industry is in danger. I think perhaps enjoying the new, the blends set before us is a way to praise the hobby, and mourning the loss of old blends, the old 965, Bengal slices, Germains special Latakia flake (or is it only me that quietly mourns that one?) is almost like writing an eulogy. I smoke a pipe for serenity, for good company, for elegance and sophistication --- that's all still alive and well and the folks at Cornell and Diehl deserve respect for carrying on in a tradition and innovating in an industry under fire. This is a great blend. It's sweeter than the older 965 blend was, that will either appeal to you or not, next time I'm getting more than just four ounces. For what it's worth if your cruising this site for blends to try either for nostalgia or novelty or curiosity and you've read this rambling review, my recommendation is that you beg, borrow, steal, or, you know, buy this blend. I also think someone weaning themselves off aromatics into English blends will find this a smooth transition. To be fair I might have a different opinion using a different pipe, but I'm not taking a star away without good cause.

Oh, almost forgot, as far as room note goes, I am surrounded by non smokers that apparently love the smell of burning tobacco; my aging folks (I have moved to MI to be a full time caretaker for them) My girlfriend, my daughter. A good english should have one banished to the garage, be accused of smoking old sweat socks. I'm just saying, room note as pleasant might be a very subjective review, I can't ever smell what my pipe does to a room, just to my own own taste buds.

14 people found this review helpful.

	Reviewed By	Date	Rating	Strength	Flavoring	Taste	Room Note
	Pipestud (1829)	2015-04-05		Mild to Medium	None Detected	Medium	Pleasant to Tolerable

A couple of days ago I was rummaging through my stash C&D tobaccos and ran across Tuggle Hall, circa 1996 - so, I guess my tin is from the first-year production. Very smooth and quite good. Loaded with unflavored Black Cavendish for lots of structure and the Latakia was also very smooth. I did not really detect the Perique except in short wisps from time to time. I smoked a few bowls again yesterday and the flavor never got old. I'm sure the age and almost 20 years of fermenting and melding made this tin so special. Did it remind me of Dunhill 965? No, not really. Two entirely different smoking experiences for me.

Pipestud

13 people found this review helpful.

	Reviewed By	Date	Rating	Strength	Flavoring	Taste	Room Note
	Demetri (113)	2009-12-12		Medium to Strong	None Detected	Medium to Full	Pleasant to Tolerable

This is a two part review of C&D's 965-Tuggle Hall for reasons I'll explain later.

Part I: I began my seven day test of Tuggle Hall 9 days ago as I was finishing up my test run of 973 - Cordial. While I found Cordial to be a grand slam home run, with Tuggle Hall I had some initial trouble. It and Cordial, smoked on same day, were not good complements of each other. My palate was too biased by each not to taint the other. By the third day however of testing Tuggle Hall alone my reaction to this turned decidedly positive. I had been unsure that I could take it as an all day smoke due to my lousy idea of smoking a sibling blend at the same time as I began this one. But Tuggle Hall has proved it can be a wonderful all day companion. Upon opening the 8 oz tin of TH one is struck with the definite classic English note. It is described as broken flake; I'd say more of a ribbon/broken flake. Upon lighting the easily packed mixture one is immediately greeted by a taste explosion of Latakia and Perique well knitted together by a creamy "Cavendish". What kind of cavendish? I've no idea. But this blend works despite the seeming simplicity of its formula. (Unlike my favorite Engine 99 which is as complex as any blend ever made in my experience). The overall taste is crisp and bold...and says "English" in a manner all English fans from the old Dunhill days will recognize. This is a tasty English to be sure, even with the perique. It has already replaced Frogmorton in my "rotation" as it has a similar Latakia kick w/o the one dimensional facet of the frog - Tuggle Hall is more rounded and its sweetness is not as edgy, but creamy, mellow instead. /An aside is due here/: Back in the mid 1970's Dunhill marketed in the USA a blend called "Dunhill American Mixture" (not listed or reviewed on TR). I bought a large dark red tin back then, beautifully appointed with fife, drums, colonial standards, 13 starred US flag, etc. It too was a lookalike for 965 but was a nicotine bomb of which I never could finish a single bowl - ever. I gave the tin away and retreated back to 965. Tuggle Hall if overly stoked can give a similar nicotine hit, but not quite as strongly. - Thank goodness. Where the similar-to-965 American Mixture caused almost instant violent hiccup spasms, Tuggle Hall only threatens to do so if pushed too hard. /Aside over/ Two mornings ago I stepped out into my sun porch with a cup of tepid tea to have my first pipe of the day. After lighting my Tuggle Hall and smoking for 5 minutes or so, I decided a hot cup of fresh brewed coffee would be a better idea and left my pipe out while I went in to brew some java. Upon returning to the porch I experienced something a smoker rarely does, the room note of his own pipe without the taste on the tongue (or,in other words, the aroma as others experience it). INSTANTLY, by magic, I was teleported back in time to 1982...

Review Part II: ...and I was entering my smoke filled office thick with the lingering aroma from my still smoldering Dr Plumb billiard loaded with my Dunhill My Mixture #965. Unmistakably, 965 -Tuggle Hall is a dead ringer for Dunhill MM965 in aroma; and from here the smoke alike comparison proceeds. Not a 100% clone in taste, Tuggle Hall shares a blending tradition with the classic Dunhill to a degree that they smell, to me, exactly the same. Since my teleportation, as I light each bowl of Tuggle I make note of the aroma as the smoke lightly waffles into my nostrils as the match first hits the tobacco. Yes, I'm home. Not six months ago I turned down purchasing 3 tins AND a pound of bulk of MM965 at my B&M eschewing the Orlik version as I have ever since they took over production for BATCO. I am not so brand conscious as to be mesmerized by a mystique in name only. Furthermore, I am convinced that back in 1966 upon my first tin of MM965 if I had found 965-Tuggle Hall in the tin instead, it would be the standard today by which I judge blends, including Dunhill's itself. C&D makes no claim of a deliberate recreation attempt here. I do believe Tuggle Hall to be a coincidental smoke-alike to MM965, and in my opinion, the superior blend nevertheless and one which deserves review on its own merits. 965- Tuggle Hall relates to (old) Dunhill My Mixture 965 in the same manner that, in the cigar world, Macanudo Robust series relates to the original Macanudo Cafe series - a recognizable family relationship, but more flavorful. For those who might insist on the most exacting "965-ness" among the C&D product line, consider #061 Stratfordshire which to me is almost exactly MM965 but with Cyprian rather than Syrian Latakia.

4 Stars for 965-Tuggle Hall

12 people found this review helpful.

	Reviewed By	Date	Rating	Strength	Flavoring	Taste	Room Note
	Gentleman Zombie (729)	2014-02-18		Medium to Strong	None Detected	Medium to Full	Pleasant to Tolerable

Another good Latakia/Burley blend. Latakia dominates the first third. The Cavendish (obviously Burley) dominates the middle third. Latakia dominates the last third. The Perique is applied lightly and provides a moderate amount of spice throughout the bowl. There's just enough sweetness to make this palatable. Without it I wouldn't be able to take this. As it is, I like this blend. I don't think it would benefit from cellaring, but I'll keep some around. 3+.

Pipe Used: MM General, MM Country Gentleman

Age When Smoked: fresh bulk

Purchased From: smokingpipes.com

10 people found this review helpful.

	Reviewed By	Date	Rating	Strength	Flavoring	Taste	Room Note
	BigWhiteWilly (10)	2011-11-03		Overwhelming	None Detected	Full	Pleasant to Tolerable

OMG!!!!! I can smoke 5 Brothers in a cob and I like what it does to me. Tuggle Hall made me see the White Buffalo, like Richard Harris' character in "A Man Called Horse". I was driving and had to pull over 1/2 way thru the bowl. I almost puked. It was great, but Gees, gimme some warning! This stuff is better than marijuana. Smoke a bowl and watch the Tele-Tubbies. Highly recommended.

7 people found this review helpful.

	Reviewed By	Date	Rating	Strength	Flavoring	Taste	Room Note
	Emeritus Account (30194)	2012-02-19		Medium to Strong	None Detected	Medium to Full	Strong

A granulated cut of deep caramel to black in color. Smells nasty but faint in the tin, latakia dominating.

This is reminiscent to Dunhill 965??? Well... maybe the very old stuff that was actually made by Dunhill, which I have not smoked. Having smoked over 100 tins of the Murrays and maybe 10 of the Orliks, I'm not making anything close to that connection with this stuff. Where 965 is sharp and clear, this one is cloudy and confused. Instead of the oily, pungent latakia in 965, this is just kind of dirty tasting. There is good flavor among the dust and it does rear its head at times... the flavor of the usual leather, wood and spices. Nice campfire aroma that becomes overpowering in the room fairly quickly. Overall, I have to go back to my first thought, which was "cloudy". If this tastes like old Dunhill 965, then Murrays improved the mixture when they took it over. This also gets very perique-y towards the end, in both taste and aroma - a definite alteration of the old formula with which I'm familiar.

This was best when I mixed some McClellands Red Cake with it. It took on a good bit of sweetness then (something it decidedly lacked without it) and became a bit more reminiscent of 965, although not much. It did improve the blend, however. What this proves to me - as has been proven many, many times with other blends - is that if you want the taste of 965, buy 965.

6 people found this review helpful.

	Reviewed By	Date	Rating	Strength	Flavoring	Taste	Room Note
	Emeritus Account (30194)	2010-01-07		Medium to Strong	Extremely Mild	Medium	Tolerable

I am not terribly familiar with 965, having smoked a bit more than a half tin of the Orlik version just shortly before it was discontinued. From memory, the 965 was definitely a bit sweeter. Not sweet, just a bit sweeter. It also did not become quite as "ashy" towards the bottom of the bowl.

This is a relatively dry (not sweet) very lightly flavored English with a whole ton of burley, to my taste. As a result, it works pretty well for me in the first third of the bowl, tends to have a bit of a nicotine wallop in the middle third, and the last third is a dark ashy thing that I don't particularly enjoy.

If the entire pipe full could be as good as the first third, this would easily be 3.5 stars. As it stands, I have to give it 2 stars, as there are a lot of other blends I prefer.

(I do very much like burley blends, especially from C&D, but this combination just doesn't work for me.)

Great cut, it's kind of chunky bits of leaf, similar to many other C&D blends, I just generally really like this cut, it behaves itself outside (where I do most of my smoking) and works well indoors too. Can require a bit of grooming, tearing up some of the larger hunks of latakia leaf.

UPDATE February 2010 After smoking this a bit more, it's growing on me. It's very important to agitate the blend before packing, as otherwise you can get a bowl with a lot of perique, or a bowl with a lot of latakia, or a bowl with a lot of burley. As you might imagine, each of those is less pleasant than a well blended bowl. This blend has a LOT of flavor, burns really well, and I like it a lot. It is a bit "dry" in flavor, not at all sweet, and I don't sense much of an Oriental presence, if any. It's a really hearty American English blend, kind of like Epiphany on steroids.

UPDATE June 2011 I've found that shredding the blend further makes it a lot more consistent in the pipe. I don't think it is as multi dimensional as Epiphany, and it's not at all sweet like 965 is.

5 people found this review helpful.

	Reviewed By	Date	Rating	Strength	Flavoring	Taste	Room Note
	StevieB (2081)	2018-01-01		Medium to Strong	Extremely Mild	Medium	Tolerable to Strong

Cornell & Diehl - Tuggle Hall.

The blend's coarse and more like a mixture than a straight ribbon. This one's not been starved of air in the loose pouch so is of a great hydration to smoke right away. The ribbons are about an equal divide between medium and dark browns.

The Perique gives only a dash of flavour, the Cavendish and Latakia are responsible for the majority. After about half of a bowl I start to get a slight honey sweetness appearing. I like it from this point, but to be honest for the first part the smoke seems too arid and empty for me. Tongue bite doesn't happen but I find the temperature too much.

The room-note's a bit full and the nicotine's medium to strong.

To tell the truth I'm a little disappointed in this. I wouldn't go as far as to only give it one star but neither would I give it any more than two.

Somewhat recommended.

Pipe Used: Various

Age When Smoked: New

Purchased From: 4noggins and Smokingpipes.com

4 people found this review helpful.

	Reviewed By	Date	Rating	Strength	Flavoring	Taste	Room Note
	Fumatore (49)	2008-06-07		Medium	None Detected	Medium to Full	Pleasant to Tolerable

I have been on a 3+ year journey searching for a replacement for my beloved Dunhill 965, and someone suggested I try this blend. So far I can only say that Tuggle Hall resembles 965 due to the similar characteristics. It misses on the creaminess and smoothness of the Dunhill weed. I believe Perique adds some underlying sweetness, but while Tuggle manages to have a sweetness, it simply can't replace whatever was used in 965 Still, I enjoy this full flavor English, and in part because one does not get an oriental overload that dominates so many of today's English blends. One can puff away all day on this one without tongue bite or having to pace oneself. I should add here that this might be a good blender for someone wishing to tame another English blend.

UPDATE: I had Craig press some of my last order of this blend and I stashed away a pound for a couple of years. This made a nice improvement, but still I can't say this is really all that comparable to Murray's 965 blend. A nice smoke none the less.

UPDATE2: I have been smoking more of this lately and I think there is a subtle change as it tastes better to me, perhaps my tastes have changed, but regardless I am rating this a 3 1/2 blend, and nearly a 4 star.

4 people found this review helpful.

	Reviewed By	Date	Rating	Strength	Flavoring	Taste	Room Note
	Theologia14 (24)	2018-01-26		Medium	None Detected	Medium to Full	Pleasant to Tolerable

This blend was a great smoke. I really didn't have high expectations for it at first, but then was blown away.

The tin note was very different from most English/American blends. It's a raisin and incense like smell. I would attribute it to the cavendish in the blend. Now, I know the description above says burley, latakia, and perique, but pipesandcigars.com says that it is cavendish not burley in this blend. I seem to detect burley in the blend, but I also do get some sweetness of the cavendish. So what's exactly in this blend? I don't know.

Upon first light the smokey latakia comes out with a bit of sour behind it. Once it settles in, the perique kicks up and some unflavored cavendish balances it with a little bit of sweetness. Everything is well balanced for a great smoke. Nothing is overpowering in this blend it all works together through the whole bowl. Then, right at the very end it finishes off with a sweet cavendish note. Definitely could be an all day blend for me.

Pipe Used: Handmade Billard

Age When Smoked: New Bulk

Purchased From: pipesandcigars.com

3 people found this review helpful.

	Reviewed By	Date	Rating	Strength	Flavoring	Taste	Room Note
	Randy Tuggle (46)	2017-12-19		Medium	None Detected	Medium	Pleasant to Tolerable

Great name! Seriously though, this is a straight-up English blend that is very enjoyable. The flavor holds up consistently throughout the smoke and burns to a fine white ash with very little to no relights. If you smoke English blends regularly, this could easily be a daily smoke choice. The flavor won't gain any real benefit from cellaring but it holds up well in a tight canning jar.

Pipe Used: Peterson Dracula 68 & Various Briars

Age When Smoked: 0 weeks

Purchased From: smokingpipes.com

3 people found this review helpful.

	Reviewed By	Date	Rating	Strength	Flavoring	Taste	Room Note
	King Weed (228)	2017-08-29		Medium to Strong	None Detected	Medium to Full	Pleasant

At our 2012 NASPC show, I was told that this blend was like Dunhill 965 and I bought two tins from another pipe smoker to find out. Although that was five years ago, the tins were dated 2010 and that makes my test smoke seven years old. You would think that seven years of aging would soften the blend, but I found my tin of TH to be rather spicy on the tongue. This is due to the inclusion of Perique in it's formula; a tobacco that is totally absent from the formula of 965. With different formulas, one would expect the two blends to smoke completely differently. Yet, we reviewers find them to smoke somewhat similarly. In other words, they overlap but do not coincide. On opening the tin, I found a blend that did, in fact, have the color range of 965 but the cut was rather roughish and shaggy compared to 965's ribbon cut. The tin aroma was reminiscent of 965 but carried an undercurrent of Perique . The smoking aroma was also reminiscent of 965 but much spicier due to the Perique. So, what we have here is a new blend that smokes like a spicier 965. The top third was dominated by the Perique and gave me a tongue tingle that, although noticeable, was not off-putting. The middle third, the best part of the smoke, was rich and full and satisfying with all components working together. The bottom third, while the least part of the smoke, was still OK and didn't fade in flavor as much as some other English blends I have smoked lately. So, while not 965, this blend can stand on it's own and I recommend it with three stars.

Pipe Used: Rich Lewis billiard (2017 NASPC pipe)

Age When Smoked: 7 years old

Purchased From: another pipe smoker at our 2012 NASPC show

Similar Blends: Tuggle Hall, although somewhat like 965, is more like a stronger version of some "American English" blends that we have all smoked over the years..

2 people found this review helpful.

	Reviewed By	Date	Rating	Strength	Flavoring	Taste	Room Note
	dixcreek (184)	2017-05-28		Medium to Strong	None Detected	Medium to Full	Pleasant

First of all this is not a comparison to My Mixture 965. Different components here. Good Scottish blend and use of sweet creamy cavendish, Latakia and peppery perique. The Lat and the cavendish are the main players and the perique is a background player that contributes enough figgy spicy taste to keep the others in line and help boost the flavor profile. Smokes fairly dry with few relights. Little Dottle as well. Over all a great smoke for me and a regular in my rotation. Strength won't knock you down but it may slap the hell out of you just to see if you are paying attention. Top shelf smoke in my book and a great addition to my ever growing collection of the wonderful weed we call tobacco.

Pipe Used: Baraccini devil anse cutty mm devil acorn

Age When Smoked: New and up to 6 months

Purchased From: Smoking pipes

2 people found this review helpful.

	Reviewed By	Date	Rating	Strength	Flavoring	Taste	Room Note
	Emeritus Account (30194)	2009-07-13		Medium	Mild	Medium	Tolerable to Strong

Ohh where is my beloved 965?(tears, whining) Oh, well it seems as though 965 is gone for good. It will always be my all time favorite. Tuggle Hall was sampled out to me to see if I thought that it would be close. Its similar but, is missing a three part dynamic IMO. Original 965 possesses a distinctive sweet, oriental tangyness that is not to be found at the right levels IMO. It is however, a very good blend that does fall in the same catagory of non-monochromatic english blends. I will say, its much better than what is being sold as 965 these days. The tobacco is rather rough, and not near as refined as 965. There was alot of lumber in the sample I got. None the less, I can say that this is so enjoyable that I will use it as a replacement, because I got the same kind of endophrine rush that 965 used to give me. Thankyou Craig and Patty Tarler, for those of us who lost our best friend when Orlick got its grubby paws on the formula, you deserve a medal of honour. Orlick has me mad, I lost DARK STRONG KENTUCKY and they murdered 965, two of my favorites. Same on them.lol!

2 people found this review helpful.

	Reviewed By	Date	Rating	Strength	Flavoring	Taste	Room Note
	REB (2)	2021-08-07		Medium to Strong	None Detected	Medium to Full	Unnoticeable

This is my first review. I'm not all that great at associating what I taste with other things. so I'll tell what I think of a tobacco pretty much in a no frills kind of way. But I do enjoy a story. Hope you do as well. The tin note: When i first opened the tin it reminded me of how my cooler smells after I've been saltwater fishing in the Ten Thousand Islands of S.W. Fla. and have something to fillet for dinner. to get a second opinion I brought the cooler in the house. My old cat was asleep in my recliner. Opened the Tuggle Hall, she immediately woke up and jumped on the cooler, fully expecting her share. Suspicions confirmed. The tin note did not put me off in the least. filled the bowl and enjoyed every single draw on the pipe from beginning till the end of the bowl. Taste was extremely flavorful, smoky and fulfilling. It burnt medium fast but cool. Left very little moisture and nothing but fine ash. Will be buying more. and strongly recommend.

Pipe Used: Molina

Age When Smoked: 5 months

Purchased From: given to me

Similar Blends: Nothing comes to mind.

1 person found this review helpful.

	Reviewed By	Date	Rating	Strength	Flavoring	Taste	Room Note
	Ducksbreath (125)	2015-10-04		Medium to Strong	None Detected	Medium	Tolerable to Strong

Update 2:

I'm upping this to 4 stars. One of the reasons is the cut is now a uniform ribbon, more like a Dunhill cut (but not that fine). I believe C&D have invested in new cutting machines. Anyway, this makes this blend better and it was good to begin with.

It has become one of a number of Englishes in my rotation, which include Dunhill London and Nightcap, plus about 3 other C&D blends. The Perique here is sharp, so it's really not like 965, but stands on its own as a 4 star English with superb Burley, as with a myriad of C&D blends. For the full bodied and Perique lover crowd.

Another update: Don't overlook this one if you like English blends. Key is to get it at the right moisture level. Not too dry, and let it sit in a jar a while. Then it's wonderful, as good as 965, but more straightforward and not a substitutue for that blend, but just plain good. It trades complexity for an intense, in your face yet balanced Engish flavor that doesn't play hide and seek

Update: I've finally learned how to get the best out of this. However, the best isn't as good as Dunhill's current offerings, especially Durbar. It does have it's charm. Another decent bulk English from C&D.

I thought I'd revisit this oldie (I mean an oldie from C&D's perspective).

I remember sampling it around the time it became available in the late 1990s. I love the smell in the pouch, so leathery and almost sweet. I like the strength, the taste is 965-ish, but rougher, and this isn't necessarily a bad thing.

However it is harsh on my palate, I find it too aggressive. It leaves its mark on the tongue. That being said, I find a lot of blends do that, however usually those are the blends which are not strong enough for me.

For reference, my favorite smokes from this blender include Bayou Night and OJK, which I can smoke all day with no chance of getting "scorched". So I can't recommend this too highly.

1 person found this review helpful.

	Reviewed By	Date	Rating	Strength	Flavoring	Taste	Room Note
	SmokeKing David (134)	2011-05-22		Medium to Strong	Extremely Mild	Medium to Full	Tolerable

A pretty full blend. I prefer it to the current version of MM 965.

Govern Yourself Accordingly

1 person found this review helpful.

	Reviewed By	Date	Rating	Strength	Flavoring	Taste	Room Note
	Emeritus Account (30194)	2010-08-20		Strong	None Detected	Full	Tolerable

I tried to like this because this is what the legendary 965 blend is supposed to be like. Maybe I'm more of a lighter english man, but this one tasted too strongly of pepper in all my bowls. I had one bowl that was really good that tasted of sutble sweetness and had blasts of flavor here and there, but then it just turns into a pepper bomb. Maybe I need to let it age and mellow out a bit.

1 person found this review helpful.

	Reviewed By	Date	Rating	Strength	Flavoring	Taste	Room Note
	Emeritus Account (30194)	2003-09-27		Medium	None Detected	Medium	Pleasant

A pretty good example of an English blend, but nowhere near as good as the Dunhill version. I think tobacco quality has a lot to do with it. I always find that C&D has some very raw tobacco, while Dunhill has one of the best in the business.

I got a sample of this pressed in 1998 and have been slowly making my way through it. Sure, it's better now than when first bought, but it never really melded together and aged as well as I figured. The room note is excellent for an English blend and it's fairly tasty, but I won't buy it again.

1 person found this review helpful.

	Reviewed By	Date	Rating	Strength	Flavoring	Taste	Room Note
	Noorrmm (192)	2002-01-31		Medium	None Detected	Medium to Full	Tolerable to Strong

This is supposed to be a copy of Dunhill 965. It's a decent smoke, but not great. There are others in the C&D line that I prefer. There are also many in the Dunhill line that I enjoy morre than 965. Sacrilege?? YMMV.

1 person found this review helpful.

	Reviewed By	Date	Rating	Strength	Flavoring	Taste	Room Note
	Emeritus Account (30194)	2012-08-28		Mild to Medium	None Detected	Very Full	Pleasant

UPDATED: Was barking up the wrong tree...not this blend at all.

Nobody has rated this review yet.